Let us listen to the sound difference between recording an output of BeatBuddy to using the identical DRM drumset directly inside a DAW. We’ll compare both to the original samples.
For the test, I am using high-quality professional mic pres and converters to record the input of the BeatBuddy, which will likely yield better results than what most BeatBuddy users will get in their entry-level recording interfaces.
Mic Pres: Focusrite ISA828
A/D Converters: Lynx Aurora-N
Procedure: I used a single sample from 4 instruments: kick, snare, bata drum, and pendereta. The original samples were mixed and normalized to 0db digital and saved in 32-bit floating point. The original samples were then dithered with noise shaping and saved to 16-bit wav, which is what was used to create DRM test drumset. Every time a note is played, a single sample is triggered repeatedly.
The BeatBuddy output volume settings was set to 100% and the input gain adjusted on the mix preamp to avoid clipping.
I created 1 bar of MIDI events in Cubase, which were triggering BeatBuddy instruments, and BeatBuddy’s output was simultaneously recorded into Cubase. The first recording was conducted by sending MIDI notes to BeatBuddy at their highest velocity, 127, resulting in BeatBuddy producing output at 0db on the digital scale.
The second recording was done by sending MIDI notes at a velocity of 64, which resulted in an output signal of approximately -5.5db on a digital scale. Everything was recorded in 24bit, normalized to 0db, and saved in 32-bit floating point so that accurate comparisons can be made and recording integrity remains 100% accurate to the original.
How to listen: Play a single instrument’s sample repeatedly, then another version of the instrument, back to back. Pay attention to the top end of the audio spectrum and the ambiance. Listen in a controlled environment on a good-quality sound system or headphones.